home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:53205 can.politics:11070
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,can.politics
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!murdoch!galen.med.Virginia.EDU!gjh
- From: gjh@galen.med.Virginia.EDU (Galen J. Hekhuis)
- Subject: Re: Abortion, Caves, Galen (WAS Vegetarianism and abortion)
- Message-ID: <1992Dec28.165015.23870@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- Followup-To: talk.abortion
- Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
- Organization: University of Virginia Health Sciences Center
- References: <1992Dec21.050552.130@ncsu.edu> <1992Dec21.175756.18186@bmerh85.bnr.ca> <aidler.725417859@sanjuan>
- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 16:50:15 GMT
- Lines: 34
-
- I've set follow-ups to head for talk abortion. I can't figure out
- what this has to do with Canadian politics, especially after I
- contribute...
-
-
- In article <aidler.725417 859@sanjuan> aidler@sanjuan.UVic.CA
- (E Alan Idler) writes:
-
- }The child has *no* advocate and no voice -- yet faces grave
- }consequences.
-
- This is quite untrue.
-
- } The physician only receives a fee
- }by performing the abortion and is, therefore, in no position
- }to be impartial.
-
- I don't think this sentence means what you think it does.
-
- }Therefore, the *only* way to provide an independent
- }ajudication of these rights and do the best for all considered
- }is to have the state provide an impartial tribunal to
- }evaluate the situation.
-
- How did we ever get along before "states"? Btw, Virginia is a
- commonwealth, would they have to change if they were to provide
- a truly impartial tribunal? And does that leave Canada Right
- Out? Or would you like to claim a la Kevin Darcy that "*only*"
- means something other than singular, in this context...
-
- --
- hang gliding mailing list: hang-gliding-request@virginia.edu
- Galen Hekhuis UVa Health Sci Ctr (804)982-1646 gjh@virginia.edu
- Illiterate? Write for FREE help...
-