home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:53191 alt.society.civil-liberty:7085 talk.politics.misc:65429
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.society.civil-liberty,talk.politics.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnews!jap
- From: jap@cbnews.cb.att.com (james.a.parker)
- Subject: Re: Is Fire Bombing a Legitimate Form of Free Speach.
- Organization: AT&T
- Distribution: na
- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 14:41:51 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Dec28.144151.8120@cbnews.cb.att.com>
- References: <1992Dec28.013646.17778@wetware.com> <1992Dec28.025605.20275@ncsu.edu> <1992Dec28.063438.18622@wetware.com>
- Lines: 9
-
- In article <1992Dec28.063438.18622@wetware.com> drieux@wetware.com (drieux, just drieux) writes:
- >Do you consider fire bombing to be a legitimate first ammendmant issue?
-
- Only if performed in a crowded theater, to legitimize the shouting of "FIRE!"
-
- 8-)8-)8-)8-)8-)8-)8-)8-)8-)8-)8-)8-)8-)8-)8-)8-)8-)8-)8-)8-)8-)8-)8-)8-)8-)8-)
-
- James Parker
- jap@cb1focus.att.com
-