home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:53189 alt.flame:17485
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.flame
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnewsc!cbfsb!att-out!cbnewsj!decay
- From: decay@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (dean.kaflowitz)
- Subject: Re: Garvin's attempts to tell only half the story
- Organization: AT&T
- Distribution: na
- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 14:12:44 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Dec28.141244.9494@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>
- Followup-To: talk.abortion
- References: <BzGu2z.9os@rice.edu> <1992Dec19.194016.2346@ncsu.edu> <nyikos.725159376@milo.math.scarolina.edu>
- Lines: 82
-
- In article <nyikos.725159376@milo.math.scarolina.edu>, nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes:
- > In <1992Dec23.132558.25246@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> decay@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (dean.kaflowitz) writes:
- >
- > >In article <1992Dec23.013921.7465@ncsu.edu>, dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
- >
- > I have added alt.flame to the newsgroups.
- >
- > >> In article <1992Dec21.003426.21330@rotag.mi.org>
- > >> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
- > >>
- > >> > Gee, seems Susie is perfectly willing to forgive someone who jokes, in
- > >> > alt.sex, about mass rape and doesn't apologize for it. I wonder if she would
- > >> > be as forgiving of someone who joked about something equally tasteless in
- > >> > alt.flame and DID apologize for making a mistake?
- > >>
- > >> But that would require consistency from Garvin.
- > >>
- >
- > Why am I NOT surprised to see Kaflowitz jump in to
- > deflect well-deserved flames [thank you, Chris Lyman, for teaching
- > me that phrase] away from Susan Garvin?
- >
- > Does Susan Garvin ever return these big favors Kaflowitz does for her
- > and the rest of the talk.abortion inner circle of women?
- >
- > >What this little discussion is about is the time Kevin Darcy
- > >accused the victim of child molestation of being a child
- > >molester, then he spent weeks trying to support his remarks,
- > >then finally apologized for it and claimed it was all a joke.
- > >Now The Reverend Douglas Holtsinger seems to find it
- > >inconsistent of Susan to be unforgiving of someone who
- > >called her SO a child molester.
- >
- > Let's see...is Kaflowitz talking about one person (Darcy) or two
- > here? I can't figure it out from what he is saying, and unlike
- > him, I am not clairvoyant. :-)
-
- One needs only a modicum of intelligence to figure it out,
- "Doctor." That explains your difficulties in comprehension.
-
- I notice that you have nothing to say on the actual issue,
- but just a pathetic attempt to act as though my words produced
- your stupidity. I can take no credit for your stupidity,
- "Doctor."
-
- > >I think the Reverend Doug is something of an idiot, and I
- > >feel secure in my expectations of consistency on that score.
- >
- > Kaflowitz is also quite consistent in his behavior. I think
- > I'll leave him alone for a while, for that reason. Parting shots:
- >
- > (1) Could someone inform me when Kaflowitz posts documentation in a
- > post when he deflects flames from Garvin, Regard and the rest
- > of the inner circle which he seems desirous of gaining entry into?
-
- One of the funnier stupidites from the "Doctor." Aside from the
- awkward wording and dangling preposition (if you want to post
- spelling flames for Mark Cochran because he typed "yoru" instead
- of "your," you should have someone who has a real degree proof
- your work), the "Doctor" seems to think I need to repost
- articles that aren't questioned at all by those who were
- involved. Darcy certainly doesn't dispute that he made
- the accusation, he just claims now that it was a joke. He
- did spend several weeks trying to justify his accusation
- before he apologized, and it wasn't until much later that he
- claimed it was a joke. The articles were posted and reposted
- numerous times in this forum. I see no need to repost them
- simply because the "Doctor" never saw them or is unable to
- remember them.
-
- > (2) Dean, did you ever find out how much you have to kowtow to Garvin
- > and Regard to gain entry? Or did they rebuff you with words like:
- > "What do men know about abortion, anyway?"
-
- Ah, you poor pathetic dim little crustacean, there is no "inner
- circle," neither Susan nor Adrienne ever say what you attribute to
- them here, although they do point out that some knowledge about
- abortion is denied men because we can't have abortions, and I've never
- been much of a joiner anyway.
-
- Dean Kaflowitz
-
-