home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!rpi!keegan
- From: keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.)
- Subject: Re: Loren Finkelstein, please clarify.
- Message-ID: <fkz28gm@rpi.edu>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hermes.acm.rpi.edu
- Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
- References: <14DEC92.20 <14DEC92.20420711@vax.clarku.edu> <1gs5tdINN88o@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca> <1992Dec26.180002.28107@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 05:51:31 GMT
- Lines: 32
-
- eeb1@quads.uchicago.edu (e elizabeth bartley) writes:
- ->ramsay@math.ubc.ca (Keith Ramsay) writes:
- ->>For one thing, there is a big difference between being willing to make
- ->>sacrifices which are actually necessary to "save" the life of a fetus,
- ->>and being willing to submit to the conditions imposed by someone else
- ->>as a condition for their doing so.
-
- ->In this case, submitting to the conditions imposed by someone else is
- ->necessary to safe the life of a fetus.
-
- it's refreshing to see you give up your pretense of
- supporting choice and openly argue in favor of anti-choice
- restrictions.
-
- ->Pro-Choice Anti-Roe - E. Elizabeth Bartley
-
- "My preferences as to when to restrict abortions
- don't allow women who prefer to wait until the third
- trimester to get abortions, no. This doesn't
- particularly upset me. I want restrictions to start
- at the *earliest* 22 weeks (more likely 24), and by
- that time she should have known she was pregnant
- long enough to have had an abortion if she wanted
- one."
- <1992May25.204212.8159@midway.uchicago.edu>
-
- "For the woman, I'd support a jail sentence of at least a
- month, probably somewhat more, (six months to a year if
- we had unlimited space in non-hellhole prisons, but we
- don't), with hefty community service tacked on to that."
- <1992May25.234304.14516@midway.uchicago.edu>
-
-