home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx!mcochran
- From: mcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Mark A. Cochran)
- Subject: Re: Proposed definitions for FAQ (Was: Reconciling OT/NT)
- Message-ID: <1992Dec28.011822.12450@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
- of Denver for the Denver community. The University has neither
- control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
- Sender: usenet@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu (netnews admin account)
- Organization: Um, err... I *know* I saw it here a few days ago...
- References: <1992Dec21.212858.28762@mksol.dseg.ti.com> <1992Dec22.063007.50924@watson.ibm.com> <nyikos.725128086@milo.math.scarolina.edu>
- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 92 01:18:22 GMT
- Lines: 47
-
- In article <nyikos.725128086@milo.math.scarolina.edu> nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes:
- >In <1992Dec22.063007.50924@watson.ibm.com> margoli@watson.ibm.com (Larry Margolis) writes:
- >
-
- [Riiiip]
-
- >Susan Garvin is at least a candidate for the title "pro-abortionist,"
- >along with everyone else who sneers at every report of wrongdoing
- >by LEGAL abortionists while choosing to blind themselves to evidence
- >that certain illegal abortions never took place.
- >
- We have yet to see any evidence of wrongdoing by legal abortionists.
- The crap you've posted about Dr. Tiller didn't show anything of the
- sort. His medical practices as you described them are certainly
- acceptable. You did post some hearsay evidence from a soruce (an
- employee who had been fired) which can by no stretch of the
- imagination (except yours) be considered either impartial or reliable.
-
- [Riiip]
-
- >[This includes opposing informed consent requirements, requirements that
- >abortionists carry a realistic amount of malpractice insurance,
- >requirements that abortions be done in EITHER a hospital OR licensed
- >clinic, requirements that SO's be ALLOWED to witness the abortion,
- >requirements that women be tested for pregnancy before D&C etc. are
- >performed, etc. It also includes those spreading disinformation about
- >these requirements already being in place, while knowing it to be false.]
- >
- You mean, like the disinformation you're spreading all the time Petey?
-
- [Riiip]
-
- >As you can see, I make distinctions as above. It is possible to be any
- >subset of the set {pro-choice, pro-abort, pro-abortionist}, including
- >(as in my case) the empty set.
- >
- Here's something we agree on Petey. You certainly qualify as an empty
- set...
-
- [Riiip]
-
-
- --
- Mark Cochran merlin@eddie.ee.vt.edu
- These are the views of my employer. They also represent the views of
- your employer, your government, the Church of your choice, and the
- Ghost of Elvis. So there.
-