NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31/NN_1992_31.iso/spool/talk/abortion/53031

Internet Message Format | 1992-12-25 | 3.9 KB

Xref: sparky talk.abortion:53031 alt.flame:17448 alt.fan.kevin-darcy:652
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.flame,alt.fan.kevin-darcy
Path: sparky!uunet!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx!kcochran
From: [e-mail] (Keith "Justified And Ancient" Cochran)
Subject: Re: Clarifying "Restrictions"
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
    of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
    control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Keywords: You expect me to mark my deletions?  Dream on...
Sender: [e-mail] (netnews admin account)
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 92 19:56:04 GMT
Lines: 67

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Kevin Darcy) writes:
>In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Mark A. Cochran) writes:
>>
>>Kebbin is just mad because we live in the Real World (tm) and not in
>>some Darcian fantasy in which it is more dangerous to terminate a
>>pregnancy then to carry the fetus to term.
>
>Learn the difference between a hypothetical question and a fantasy, ignoramus.

"Kevin Darcy is a genius".  Hypothetical question or fantasy?  You be the
judge.

>
>>Considering his tendancy to
>>argue both sides of any given question, I'd say he is the one who
>>needs to be concerned with moral inconsistancy.
>
>Arguing a position and believing it aren't necessarily the same thing, schmuck.

You know, Kevin, I'm beginning to believe that you're a Cochran-phobe.  With
your gratuitious insults and deaming comments to anybody with the surname
Cochran, I feel it's quite obvious that you have an irrational hatred of
people named Cochran.  Granted, the only "proof" I have of this is your
posts, and posting style, but I think that speaks plainly enough for everybody
to see.

>
>>I'm still waiting for your real life example to validate your question
>>Kebbin...
>
>Can you guarantee me that there is no possible or foreseeable combination of
>medical factors which could make termination of pregnancy more dangerous
>than carrying to term? Are you willing to put whatever medical credentials
>you possess on the line over this question? I _do_ have some contacts at
>the UofM Medical Center (largest medical complex in the world, perhaps
>you've heard of it?), which is a couple of miles down the road from me.
>I _can_ check this out, if necessary, and if you've been propagating bogus
>medical information on the Net... well...

Kebbin brags, evades the question, and then makes yet another veiled threat
against a person named Cochran.

This is turning into your "it's not legal in every state to use lethal force
to stop a rape" thing, isn't it?  Why don't you stop waffling, and just
give us a situation (hypothetical or not) where ending a pregnancy is more
dangerous to the woman than continuing it?

>
>>As has been said before. Analogies need to have some basis in reality.
>
>Incorrect. Analogies, to be valid, need only demonstrate the operative
>principles in question, hopefully in a way that is clearer than in the
>original issue at hand. They can, and often do, deal with hypothetical
>situations, rather than so-called "real" ones.

Yea, and we all know how many people were swayed by the "glue slatherer"
analogy...

>
>How long do you plan on evading the question, by the way?

He's not evading the question, Kibbles&Bit.  You are.
--
=[e-mail] | B(0-4) c- d- e++ f- g++ k(+) m r(-) s++(+) t | TSAKC=
=My thoughts, my posts, my ideas, my responsibility, my beer, my pizza.  OK???=
=This .signature file will be in Chicago, Illinois, USA From 12/26/92 until   =
=01/03/92.  Have you given *YOUR* .signature a vacation from the net lately???=