home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!udel!gatech!pitt.edu!sgast
- From: sgast+@pitt.edu (Susan Garvin)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: A Bare-Fased misrepresentation in same sentence by DODIE: Points?
- Message-ID: <1154@blue.cis.pitt.edu>
- Date: 24 Dec 92 18:25:37 GMT
- References: <34614@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU> <1992Dec24.033906.16829@ncsu.edu> <34625@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU>
- Sender: news+@pitt.edu
- Organization: University of Pittsburgh
- Lines: 34
-
-
- I say, 10 points for Mr. Mezias.
-
-
- In article <34625@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU> smezias@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU (Stephen J. Mezias) writes:
- #In article <1992Dec24.033906.16829@ncsu.edu>
- #dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes the perfect
- #sentence to capture the full essence of why he is regarded as a prime
- #net liar. I have difficulty understanding such behavior because it is
- #so clearly revealing of an ends-justifies-the-means mentality as to be
- #uncomfortably manipulative to read:
- #
- ##I have stated numerous times I am undecided on the issue of
- ##legislation, but that I do oppose Roe v. Wade and the FOCA.
- #
- #In the context of talk.abortion, it is incomprehensible to me that one
- #could claim to be undecided on legislative issues and opposed to FOCA.
- #Your mention of your opposition of RvW suggests that you would
- #probably make the broader claim that you are undecided about state
- #intervention to compel pregnancy while being opposed to RvW.
- #
- ##My arguments against abortion often revolve around moral
- ##issues, and they should not be confused with arguments in
- ##favor of legal restrictions.
- #
- #Last time I checked deliberate misrepresentation and lying were
- #generally considered immoral. Is that a clue about how to
- #characterize your side of the issue?
-
-
- Now, let's watch DODie ignore Mezias' post.
-
- Susan
-
-