home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / talk / abortion / 52742 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-12-22  |  1.2 KB  |  34 lines
  1. Newsgroups: talk.abortion
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!concert!rock!taco!csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu!dsholtsi
  3. From: dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)
  4. Subject: Re: Pro-choicers must condone infanticide
  5. Message-ID: <1992Dec23.013411.7322@ncsu.edu>
  6. Sender: news@ncsu.edu (USENET News System)
  7. Reply-To: dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)
  8. Organization: North Carolina State University
  9. References: <1992Dec15.025342.12892@ncsu.edu> <1992Dec15.213658.790@ncar.ucar.edu> <1992Dec22.203333.28731@ncsu.edu> <1992Dec22.234506.23392@ncar.ucar.edu>
  10. Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 01:34:11 GMT
  11. Lines: 21
  12.  
  13. In article <1992Dec22.234506.23392@ncar.ucar.edu> 
  14. kauff@neit.cgd.ucar.edu (Brian Kauffman) writes:
  15.  
  16. > *You're* the one who casually asserted that (see above)
  17. > "there is no difference between a late-term fetus and an infant".
  18. > Do you really believe there are no significant distinguishing
  19. > factors between a late-term fetus and an infant?! <y,n>
  20.  
  21. There are factual differences between a late-term fetus
  22. and a newborn infant, but I have not heard any arguments
  23. from pro-choicers which would give *moral* weight to these
  24. facts.  Thus I conclude that there is no moral difference
  25. between killing a newborn infant and killing a late-term 
  26. fetus.
  27.  
  28.  
  29. >-Brian
  30.  
  31.  
  32. Doug Holtsinger
  33.  
  34.