home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / talk / abortion / 52716 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-12-22  |  1010 b   |  31 lines
  1. Newsgroups: talk.abortion
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!gatech!concert!rock!taco!csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu!dsholtsi
  3. From: dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)
  4. Subject: Re: Pro-choicers must condone infanticide
  5. Message-ID: <1992Dec22.204542.29174@ncsu.edu>
  6. Sender: news@ncsu.edu (USENET News System)
  7. Reply-To: dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)
  8. Organization: North Carolina State University
  9. References: <1992Dec15.025342.12892@ncsu.edu> <BzBtKo.IK2@cup.hp.com>
  10. Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 20:45:42 GMT
  11. Lines: 18
  12.  
  13. In article <BzBtKo.IK2@cup.hp.com> 
  14. runyan@cup.hp.com (Mark Runyan) writes:
  15.  
  16. > I'm sure you'll agree that not all pro-choicers support
  17. > unrestricted abortion-on-demand.  
  18.  
  19. Some pro-choicers have stated that you cannot be pro-choice
  20. unless you actively oppose all restrictions on abortion.
  21. I'm merely adopting their definition of 'pro-choice'.  
  22.  
  23. My posting wasn't directed at those people who support 
  24. some restrictions on abortion. 
  25.  
  26. >Mark Runyan
  27.  
  28.  
  29. Doug Holtsinger
  30.  
  31.