home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:52642 alt.flame:17269
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.flame
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!nigel.msen.com!heifetz!rotag!kevin
- From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
- Subject: Re: Sexual Harassment (was Re: Simon you're no ...
- Message-ID: <1992Dec22.040832.24797@rotag.mi.org>
- Organization: Who, me???
- References: <BzD9GL.L7s@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1992Dec20.021358.18235@rotag.mi.org> <1992Dec20.172746.50639@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 04:08:32 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <1992Dec20.172746.50639@watson.ibm.com> margoli@watson.IBM.com writes:
- >In <1992Dec20.021358.18235@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
- >>
- >>The point here
- >>is that Cochran has thrown his support behind a "legal restriction" that
- >>doesn't exist right now.
- >
- >No he didn't, that's your misinterpretation.
- >
- >>and his pigheaded refusal to clarify tends to give more credence to
- >>that interpretation than to yours and Larry's.
- >
- >He *has* clarified, and your interpretation is incorrect. I don't
- >understand your pigheaded refusal to accept that.
-
- He has NOT clarified, Larry, he has obfuscated. I asked him what his
- "restriction" was designed to "restrict". No straight answer. I asked him
- about women in comas. No straight answer. I asked him about Abortion
- Request Forms. No straight answer. I asked him for an exact definitions of
- "ask" and "her doctor". No straight answer. When he starts _answering_,
- instead of just _dodging_, then I might drop the subject.
-
- - Kevin
-