home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / soc / singles / 35210 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-03  |  1.4 KB
  1. Xref: sparky soc.singles:35210 alt.abortion.inequity:6261
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!usc!news.service.uci.edu!ucivax!news.claremont.edu!nntp-server.caltech.edu!peri
  3. From: peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri)
  4. Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.abortion.inequity
  5. Subject: Re: Maternity/paternity insurance
  6. Date: 4 Jan 1993 00:03:52 GMT
  7. Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
  8. Lines: 18
  9. Message-ID: <1i7ut8INN7q6@gap.caltech.edu>
  10. References: <1992Dec28.231923.25821@Cadence.COM> <DANIEL.92Dec30094754@algol.clsi.COM> <1i50iqINNjvu@gap.caltech.edu> <C09EFz.520@ddsw1.mcs.com>
  11. NNTP-Posting-Host: punisher.caltech.edu
  12.  
  13. karl@ddsw1.mcs.com (Karl Denninger) writes:
  14.  
  15. >In article <1i50iqINNjvu@gap.caltech.edu> peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:
  16. >>>Hey, that's what we need: paternity/maternity insurance!  Then we wouldn't 
  17. >>>have to argue about forcing abortion, or withholding child support from 
  18. >>>children, or insulting with contracts.  Why hasn't someone thought of this yet?
  19. >>
  20. >>This is rich!  Would we require all men to carry such insurance?
  21.  
  22. >How about all women?  I think that's at least as an appropriate requirement.
  23.  
  24. Sure.  All men.  And all women (of childbearing age).  Fair enough.
  25.  
  26. -- 
  27.  
  28.                                                 --  Michal
  29. ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  30. Of course there's no reason!  
  31.