home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky soc.singles:35189 soc.women:22054 soc.men:22037 misc.legal:21977 alt.abortion.inequity:6252
- Newsgroups: soc.singles,soc.women,soc.men,misc.legal,alt.abortion.inequity
- Path: sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!yktnews!admin!The-Village!waterbed
- From: margoli@watson.ibm.com (Larry Margolis)
- Subject: Re: Pro-Choice Parents != Bad Parents
- Sender: news@watson.ibm.com (NNTP News Poster)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan03.071042.15516@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Sun, 03 Jan 1993 07:10:42 GMT
- News-Software: IBM OS/2 PM RN (NR/2) v0.16f by O. Vishnepolsky and R. Rogers
- Lines: 21
- Reply-To: margoli@watson.IBM.com
- Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
- References: <1993Jan3.012313.21866@zooid.guild.org>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: netslip63.watson.ibm.com
- Organization: The Village Waterbed
-
- In <1993Jan3.012313.21866@zooid.guild.org> Will Steeves <goid@zooid.guild.org> writes:
- >whedon@netcom.com (Bill Whedon) writes...
- >>Stuff above having been deleted for clarity, I would simply inject the thought
- >>that most of the men coming down on the "pro" side of the contract issue are
- > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- >>of a sort best nut-cut and non-procreative.
- > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- >
- >Not at all. *I* have a baby daughter, whom I *did* want, but I also support
- >the right of men and women to decide when they should be parents.
- >
- >
- >>I'd certainly not like to have
- >>any one of them as _my_ father. Bunch of priggish anal-retentive gits.
- >
- >Neither of your parents is "pro-choice" then, I take it?
-
- He said "on the 'pro' side of the *contract* issue". What does this have to
- do with "pro-choice"?
- --
- Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
-