home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!markh
- From: markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark)
- Newsgroups: soc.singles
- Subject: Re: Financial first-date negotiations
- Date: 30 Dec 1992 04:13:59 GMT
- Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
- Lines: 14
- Message-ID: <1hr7m7INN457@uwm.edu>
- References: <102845@netnews.upenn.edu> <1992Dec22.000021.14160@cs.ucla.edu> <095M03fBc6=w00@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
-
- gds@york.cs.ucla.edu (Greg Skinner) writes:
- }Perhaps this is because some of us, instead of accepting traditional
- }roles, have chosen to question those roles and define roles for
- }ourselves more to our liking.
-
- In article <095M03fBc6=w00@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> jsp@pls.amdahl.com writes:
- >Jeez, do you think you could be just a little more arrogant about this?
-
- Somebody's got to be arrogant, otherwise roles would have never come to be
- defined in the first place.
-
- History demands that roles be periodically redefined and renewed as the old ones
- become dangerously outmoded. That is the purpose, the perogative, and even
- the duty of our generation.
-