home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / soc / singles / 34890 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-12-29  |  1.2 KB
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!markh
  2. From: markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark)
  3. Newsgroups: soc.singles
  4. Subject: Re: Females have it easy!
  5. Date: 29 Dec 1992 01:38:56 GMT
  6. Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
  7. Lines: 13
  8. Message-ID: <1hoa7gINNmn1@uwm.edu>
  9. References: <1hiaj3INN5n9@uwm.edu> <JMD.92Dec28111514@lion.bear.com> <1992Dec28.183540.1181@bnlux1.bnl.gov>
  10. NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
  11.  
  12. In article <1992Dec28.183540.1181@bnlux1.bnl.gov> schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov (gary l. schroeder) writes:
  13. >Add one more vote for
  14. >Men-Who-Don't-Find-Christie-Brinkley-or-Cindy-Crawford-Attreactive-Because 
  15. >They-Look-Too-Much-Like-Vaccuum-Formed-Foam-Dolls.  There is a very
  16. >precise difference between "beauty" and "near-physical perfection".
  17. >Brinkley and Crawford have (for the most part) perfectly developed
  18. >features, clean, white teeth, flat stomachs and shiny hair.
  19.  
  20. It's not perfection I disagree with, it's the fact that the wrong definition
  21. of perfection is being used.  Cory Everson is perfection.  Cindy Crawford
  22. looks too much like a frail girly woman.
  23.  
  24. Brinkley and Crawford are most certainly not perfect.
  25.