home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: soc.singles
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!udel!gvls1!sequoia!liz
- From: liz@vfl.paramax.com (Liz Loquacious)
- Subject: Re: Why there might be a need for a (Pre-Sex Contract)
- Message-ID: <1992Dec23.191052.28165@gvl.unisys.com>
- Followup-To: soc.singles
- Sender: liz@sequoia (Liz Bradley)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: sequoia
- Organization: Paramax Systems
- References: <1992Dec18.003949.23624@netcom.com> <1992Dec18.080919.20145@netcom.com> <1992Dec18.163211.14140@gvl.unisys.com> <1992Dec18.212948.27768@netcom.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 19:10:52 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <1992Dec18.212948.27768@netcom.com>, tyger@netcom.com (Kristen Kohlbecker) writes:
- |>
- |> The girl's monthly expenses were found to be in the neighborhood of $9,000 per
- |> month. Meaning that this girl *spends* what most of us average joes *earn* a
- |> month. And yes, that's what she's accustomed to, and all that, and that's
- |> *dandy*, but it has always been my understanding that child-support was to
- |> attend to a child's *needs* (in textbooks only these days, possibly, but that
- |> was always *my* understanding) What child *needs* a Porsche, or for that matter,
- |> needs a free and clear income of $180,000 a year? Merciful heavens....
-
- About needs...no I don't think divorce is supposed to cause a child to drop
- down from luxury lifestyle to subsistence level when the parents both can
- obviously afford to give her the lavish life regardless of how nauseating
- it may be.
-
- Liz Loquacious
-
- Have a nice holiday!
-
-