home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: soc.singles
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!gatech!destroyer!fmsrl7!lynx!carina.unm.edu!blowfish
- From: blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.)
- Subject: Re: Females have it easy!
- Message-ID: <w8gr=j-@lynx.unm.edu>
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 92 07:58:24 GMT
- Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
- References: <JoeMan.7.724562272@> <m-crh6-@lynx.unm.edu> <JoeMan.9.724896947@>
- Lines: 33
-
- In article <JoeMan.9.724896947@> JoeMan@ (Joe Tooman) writes:
- >Actually Blowfish, I am not clueless. I, like most, had have my share of
- >You must be 'clueless' to
- >flame a person in soc.singles. You must really impress those women with your
- >keen intellect.
-
- *snicker*
- Actually, Joe, I've been flaming people since long before this group was even
- named soc.singles. I don't flame people to impress women, I flame people to
- show them what ignorant attitudes they have.
-
- >I sure you don't have a problem, you just hand them the money and you have
- >your instant date (c) that will not run away at the sight of your worm sized
- >mantool (tm). I have more a life then I doubt you will ever have, I don't
- >have time to search for people to flame in my spare time, unlike you.
- >You just haven't looked at the mirror recently. (I wonder why)
-
- Is it me or was this paragraph compleatly pointless?
-
- >>>In my last relationship, my SO always commented how a guy would
- >>>ask for her phone number once a day on average, while I have never been asked
- >>>once for my phone number except by some undesirables.
- >>Ahh, the key. Its the womans fault for being undesierable, not his fault for
- >>not liking them.
- >I admit I am picky, but if I am not pysically attracted to someone, I can't
- >enjoy the relationship.
-
- But you claim that you're a 7 out of a 10, but only 'undesierable' women ask
- for your phone number? And why can't you enjoy a relationship with a woman
- that is not the height of physical perfection?
- Haven't you ever heard of 'intelligence' and 'personality'?
- Evidently not.
- r.
-