home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!ub!galileo.cc.rochester.edu!troi.cc.rochester.edu!jsmt
- From: jsmt@troi.cc.rochester.edu (Julia Smith)
- Newsgroups: soc.singles
- Subject: Re: Attraction -> Acquiantance or vice versa?
- Message-ID: <1992Dec21.211848.18985@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>
- Date: 21 Dec 92 21:18:48 GMT
- References: <1992Dec10.230728.13514@cbnewsk.cb.att.com> <1992Dec11.014850.11707@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> <1992Dec20.062849.4378@microsoft.com>
- Sender: news@galileo.cc.rochester.edu
- Distribution: usa
- Organization: University of Rochester (Rochester, NY)
- Lines: 18
- Nntp-Posting-Host: troi.cc.rochester.edu
-
- In article <1992Dec20.062849.4378@microsoft.com> jenk@microsoft.com (Jen Kilmer) writes:
- >In article <1992Dec11.014850.11707@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> jsmt@troi.cc.rochester.edu (Julia Smith) writes:
- >>
- >>News Flash - Women are PEOPLE, not just potential mates or partners.
- >
- >Why Julia, you sound just like the only real, unchanging difference
- >between women and men is the plumbing.
- >
- >;>
- >
- Not at all. It would be just as ridiculous to argue that all men
- are exactly the same by virtue of their plumbing. I have met enough
- boys who's only claim to manhood is their ability to piss standing up -
- it just aint enough to bet the ranch on.
-
- ;>
-
- --j
-