home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: soc.motss
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!urmel.informatik.rwth-aachen.de!Sirius.dfn.de!ira.uka.de!yale.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!convex!egsner!adaptex!sdf!marco
- From: marco@sdf.lonestar.org (Steve Giammarco)
- Subject: Re: Rules of Conduct
- Message-ID: <C0AALL.GtJ@sdf.lonestar.org>
- Organization: sdf public access Unix, Dallas -- 214-436-3281
- References: <1993Jan2.192936.22547@csc.ti.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 15:20:08 GMT
- Lines: 29
-
- In article <1993Jan2.192936.22547@csc.ti.com> thrift@ra.csc.ti.com (Phil Thrift) writes:
-
- >Now I have never been in the military, but I have a general idea
- >what goes on, regulations or not (I've seen, for example,
- >"Boys of Company F" - BTW Rick Donovan's debut).
-
- You _really_ should use smiley faces here, Phil.. Some folx are
- sarcasm impaired..
-
- >Now it seems that current regulations say that a male soldier
- >can be sent to military prison for allowing a female (even wife)
- >to touch his penis with her lips, so things are troublesome for
- >heterosexuals already. But what will the eventual rules of conduct
- >be that govern homosexual behavior?
-
- Welp. I *was* in the military for 5 years and do not recall an article in
- the Uniform Code of Military Justice or any of the Air Force Regulations
- that prohibit oral sex between consenting heterosexuals. If I'm not mistaken,
- the only thing the military frowns upon (severely) is "fraternization",
- i.e., officers/supervisors with enlisted/direct reports. If you have
- _actual_ evidence to the contrary, please quote by regulation/reference.
-
-
-
-
- --
- Steve Giammarco/5330 Peterson Lane/Dallas TX 75240
- marco@sdf.lonestar.org
- loveyameanit.
-