home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / soc / motss / 54633 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-03  |  955 b 
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!doc.ic.ac.uk!agate!spool.mu.edu!wupost!usc!rpi!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.uoregon.edu!news.uoregon.edu!systems
  2. From: dise@decoy.uoregon.edu (David Casti)
  3. Newsgroups: soc.motss
  4. Subject: Re: Colorado #2, Constitutionality
  5. Message-ID: <1i7bkvINNdi6@pith.uoregon.edu>
  6. Date: 3 Jan 93 18:35:11 GMT
  7. References: <1992Dec31.015328.13338@bsu-ucs>
  8. Reply-To: dise@decoy.uoregon.edu
  9. Organization: University of Oregon Network Services
  10. Lines: 9
  11. NNTP-Posting-Host: cisco-ts2-line27.uoregon.edu
  12.  
  13. In article <1992Dec31.015328.13338@bsu-ucs> d000dlphi@leo.bsuvc.bsu.edu (David  
  14. Speakman) writes:
  15.  
  16. > The U.S. congress could strike the ammendment down.
  17.  
  18. Are you sure you're not thinking of judicial review?  The congress has no  
  19. power to "strike down" anything.  The best they could do is enact a federal  
  20. statute that was in conflict with the Colorado state constitution.  Even then,  
  21. it could still be tied up in the courts for years...
  22.