home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / soc / motss / 53978 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-12-29  |  773 b 
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!yale.edu!yale!hsdndev!spdcc!shafer
  2. From: shafer@spdcc.com (Mary Shafer)
  3. Newsgroups: soc.motss
  4. Subject: Re: Small grooming question
  5. Message-ID: <1992Dec29.182342.23377@spdcc.com>
  6. Date: 29 Dec 92 18:23:42 GMT
  7. References: <1hnconINN62i@im4u.cs.utexas.edu> <thaaang.725623801@cwis>
  8. Organization: S.P. Dyer Computer Consulting, Cambridge MA
  9. Lines: 9
  10.  
  11. In article <thaaang.725623801@cwis> thaaang@cwis.unomaha.edu (John Dorrance) writes:
  12. >I don't know, would Nair work? (And, tangentally, would Nair work
  13. >in more... delicate places?)
  14.  
  15. The Nair euphemism is "bikini line" and yes, it does work there, or so
  16. says a friend of mine who has used it.  I'd keep it off mucous
  17. membranes, though.
  18. -- 
  19. Mary Shafer  DoD #0362 KotFR  shafer@ursa-major.spdcc.com
  20.