home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!olivea!sgigate!odin!mips!tattoo.mti.sgi.com!dauber
- From: dauber@tattoo.mti.sgi.com (Jeff Dauber)
- Newsgroups: soc.motss
- Subject: Re: Small grooming question
- Message-ID: <1hpvikINNq3k@spim.mti.sgi.com>
- Date: 29 Dec 92 16:49:24 GMT
- References: <1hnconINN62i@im4u.cs.utexas.edu> <1992Dec28.182753.5383@spdcc.com> <1992Dec29.011524.23560@netcom.com>
- Reply-To: dauber@tattoo.mti.sgi.com (Jeff Dauber)
- Organization: sgi
- Lines: 14
- NNTP-Posting-Host: tattoo.mti.sgi.com
-
- In article <1992Dec29.011524.23560@netcom.com>, foucault@netcom.com (Howard Arthur Faye) writes:
-
-
- |> Well, actually, a Wahl razor works very well as long as you find
- |> someone to do the honors. I trim my Ken's beard every couple of
- |> weeks, and the Wahl attachments (Numbers 1 through 4) regulate
- |> the length of the hair cut. A '1' will remove nearly all hair
- |> but spares the skin.
-
- Using no guard works much better. However, it does leave you a long
- way from being shiny bald.
-
-
- FWA
-