home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!news-is-not-mail
- From: osborn@cs.utexas.edu (John Howard Osborn)
- Newsgroups: soc.motss
- Subject: Re: Small grooming question
- Date: 28 Dec 1992 22:21:47 -0600
- Organization: CS Dept, University of Texas at Austin
- Lines: 20
- Message-ID: <1hojorINNs7s@im4u.cs.utexas.edu>
- References: <1hnconINN62i@im4u.cs.utexas.edu> <1992Dec28.210354.26186@netcom.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: im4u.cs.utexas.edu
-
- In article <1992Dec28.210354.26186@netcom.com> ds@netcom.com (David Schachter) writes:
- >8. You mentioned "permanent" results. For that, here are some choices:
-
- I shouldn't have. What I really meant (and of course should have said)
- was "long term" or even "continual." Thanks for the suggestions.
-
-
- For me, at least, voluntary baldness almost always looks erotic and
- frequently sexy which pretty much makes it the antithesis of those
- insecure types who get absurd haircuts to mask their baldspot (ick).
- Self-confidence vs. insecurity - I think more men would show their
- buttocks in public than their scalp. Anybody else out their find
- bald men a serious turn-on?
-
-
- --
- -
- -John H. Osborn - Boycott Colorado
- -osborn@cs.utexas.edu - Enforced discrimination MUST NOT STAND
- -DOD# 2001 '92 BMW Paris-Dakar - Queer, Proud, and Angry
-