home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / soc / motss / 53836 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-12-27  |  1.1 KB  |  29 lines
  1. Newsgroups: soc.motss
  2. From: nigel@stonewall.demon.co.uk (Nigel Whitfield)
  3. Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!stonewall.demon.co.uk!nigel
  4. Subject: Re: The Foreskin-Impaired (was Re: Drooling over...)
  5. Organization: Jenny Agutter Fan Club
  6. References: <1h6fivINNp1n@uniwa.uwa.edu.au> <1992Dec22.192904.18544@netcom.com> <RHAYDEN.92Dec26173107@hqsun2.oracle.com>
  7. Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 19:06:44 +0000
  8. Message-ID: <BzxMF9.6sJ@stonewall.demon.co.uk>
  9. Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk
  10. Lines: 17
  11.  
  12. In article <RHAYDEN.92Dec26173107@hqsun2.oracle.com> rhayden@oracle.com (Ronald Hayden) writes:
  13. >
  14. >Also, some people say that the increased sensitivity due to the lack
  15. >of a foreskin makes for shorter lovemaking.
  16.  
  17. Shurely shome mishtake? I always thought that the glans became less
  18. sensitive as a result of being permanently exposed?
  19.  
  20. BTW, one of the guys in my house has recently been circumcised, so I'll
  21. ask his opinion.
  22.  
  23. Nigel.
  24. -- 
  25. [Nigel Whitfield                               nigel@stonewall.demon.co.uk]
  26. [For details on the uk-motss mailing list mail uk-motss-request@pyra.co.uk]
  27. [*****  All demon.co.uk sites are independently run internet hosts   *****]
  28.  
  29.