home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: soc.motss
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zazen!anderson
- From: anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson)
- Subject: Re: Dworkin (was Re: Liberty)
- Message-ID: <1992Dec23.123033.4883@macc.wisc.edu>
- Sender: news@macc.wisc.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: Madison Academic Computing Center, UW-Madison
- References: <1992Dec22.172912.2724@tc.cornell.edu> <18223@autodesk.COM> <1992Dec23.055209.27606@panix.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 92 12:30:33 GMT
- Lines: 61
-
- In article <1992Dec23.055209.27606@panix.com> mls@panix.com
- (Michael Siemon) writes:
-
- >Male assurances of "understanding" the problems of systematic
- >oppression of women amount to a hill of beans. Most men have
- >ZERO comprehension of what it is to be the object of a total
- >societal negation. If Dowrkin can get men, for a *few* moments
- >of their oh-so-precious time to see an absolute negation of
- >their worth, they *may* [if they have some capacity for clues]
- >begin to *feel* (and not dismiss by abstraction) what women
- >generally have to put up with every bloody second of their
- >lives.
-
- Well said. I've read only *about* Dworkin, not her own
- words, though the quotes recently made here seem pretty
- vividly off the wall. I took Melinda to be saying, in
- effect, that despite that, there is an image that could
- be revealing to anyone who will consider it, embedded in
- Dworkin's extreme rhetoric.
-
- More generally, even insanity is not entirely insane; things
- that don't seem to have solid or reliable reasons behind
- them rest on *some* reality.
-
- To that extent I disagree with Arne. While I understand his
- economy in not being willing to lend credence to someone as
- extreme as Dworkin, I feel *nevertheless* there is *a*
- reality to be seen and appreciated in some fashion in the
- ideas reported here as Dworkin's.
-
- Perhaps more obviously, whenever and wherever the subject of
- Dworkin arises, there is strong reaction. Whatever else one
- might say about her, she is not a cipher in anyone's mind,
- because as a dynamic principle she moves the universe.
-
- The underlying point, it seems to me, is that for one of the
- oldest reasons on earth -- you wouldn't expect a fish to
- discover water, Rob Bernardo used to say -- men (with
- discouragingly few exceptions) have interests vested in
- denying the extent (and more, the extent of the *effects*)
- of male privilege and patriarchy. Frankly, I think it's
- more socially productive for us to treat the statement "men,
- all men, have *no* idea about this" as a truism, and work
- from there.
-
- To go further, it seems to me this principle generalizes
- some little distance, as it can illuminate other oppressions
- too: racism, notably, but certainly homophobia as well. The
- privileged do not in general see such things.
-
- This seems to me something like a deformation of the entire
- process of feeling, especially of feeling compassion. The
- social utility, I expect, of having this heal over, after
- all these hundreds of years, would be beyond imagining a
- wonderful thing (since I can't know, I'll just guess).
-
- --
- [Jess Anderson <> Madison Academic Computing Center <> University of Wisconsin]
- [Internet: anderson@macc.wisc.edu <-best, UUCP:{}!uwvax!macc.wisc.edu!anderson]
- [Room 3130 <> 1210 West Dayton Street / Madison WI 53706 <> Phone 608/262-5888]
- [---------> Discrimination, Bigotry, and Hate are not Family Values <---------]
-