home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / soc / men / 21976 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-01  |  1.3 KB
  1. Xref: sparky soc.men:21976 alt.feminism:6692
  2. Newsgroups: soc.men,alt.feminism
  3. Path: sparky!uunet!panther!mothost!lmpsbbs!areaplg2.corp.mot.com!bhv
  4. From: bhv@areaplg2.corp.mot.com (Bronis Vidugiris)
  5. Subject: Re: Damned Articles
  6. Organization: Motorola, CCR&D, CORP, Schaumburg, IL
  7. Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 18:45:02 GMT
  8. Message-ID: <1992Dec31.184502.9628@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com>
  9. References: <hjm5uINNgml@agate.berkeley.edu> <>> <1hkqjdINNj7d@agate.berkeley.edu> <725509230@lear.cs.duke.edu> <1992Dec29.201053.8237@panix.com>
  10. Sender: news@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com (Net News)
  11. Nntp-Posting-Host: 137.23.47.37
  12. Lines: 14
  13.  
  14. In article <1992Dec29.201053.8237@panix.com> gcf@panix.com (Gordon Fitch) writes:
  15. )gazit@cs.duke.edu (Hillel) writes:
  16. )| The following article was rejected from soc.feminism. ...
  17. )
  18. )I think if your articles are going to wear this badge of
  19. )honor, we ought to have the citation as well.  That is, it
  20. )would seem fair -- and would satisfy our curiosity -- if we
  21. )could know what reason the moderators gave.  Even though what
  22. )the reason must have been often seems all too obvious.
  23.  
  24. I think that would be too much like posting private E-mail, though I must
  25. admit I was tempted to do just that when I was still reading soc.feminism
  26. and experienceing some severe problems with the moderation there.
  27.  
  28.