home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky soc.college:5850 alt.usage.english:9868
- Newsgroups: soc.college,alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!citec!sgcclmj
- From: sgcclmj@citec.oz.au (Liz Jones)
- Subject: Re: Sexist language
- Organization: CITEC
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 01:08:52 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Dec22.010852.29943@citec.oz.au>
- References: <1992Dec18.032009.4477@bmerh85.bnr.ca>
- Lines: 23
-
- nadeau@bnr.ca (Rheal Nadeau) writes:
- : >
- : >>Isn't this a basic tenant of English? :-)
- : >
- : >No, there are rules, such as the fact that H. Dumpty, being a person,
- : >should be referred to by a personal pronoun, e.g.
- : >
- : >"Isn't he a basic tenant of English?" :-)
- :
- : Silly you! Humpty-Dumpty is an egg, and thus feminine (sperm are male,
- : of course!) So that should be "Isn't she a basic tenant of English?"
- :
- : (Oh my, is this silly season in a.u.e.?)
- :
-
- Excuse me, but I'm confused. What is "a tenant of English"?
-
- The only other thing I can think of is that it should be "tenet".
-
- Please point out whatever it is that I'm not seeing...
-
- Liz
-
-