home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky soc.college:5835 alt.usage.english:9830
- Newsgroups: soc.college,alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!newsflash.concordia.ca!mizar.cc.umanitoba.ca!ens
- From: ens@ccu.umanitoba.ca ()
- Subject: Re: They (was Re: Shaking people up with "she"? (was Re: Sexist language))
- Message-ID: <BzMIqJ.3r9@ccu.umanitoba.ca>
- Sender: news@ccu.umanitoba.ca
- Nntp-Posting-Host: ccu.umanitoba.ca
- Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- References: <1992Dec15.182137.18930@news.eng.convex.com> <12149@scott.ed.ac.uk> <1992Dec19.181833.22444@cdf.toronto.edu> <BzJtDr.D3I@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 19:13:30 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- (Mandar M. Mirashi) writes:
- >(Rosemary Waigh) writes:
-
- >>I know no one my age who rejects the semantically singular "they", except
- >>perhaps in extremely formal writing.
- >This is either ignorance or an attempt at being dense. Rosemary, MANY
- >persons on the soc.college newsgroups rejected the use of "they" as
- >in "That person isn't late, are they?" and *most* of them are of your
- >age.
-
- If you demonstrate anything with this example (and in others elsewhere)
- it is only that there are sentences in which the use of gender-neutral
- 'they' is not appropriate. But you claim that people reject it in
- general, which requires better evidence. Few people object to
- "Someone's been eating my porridge, and they've eaten it all up."
- And just as few would say "The nurse is late, isn't he".
-
- Werner
-
-