home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky soc.bi:17109 soc.motss:53352
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!cmcl2!panix!mara
- From: mara@panix.com (Mara Chibnik)
- Newsgroups: soc.bi,soc.motss
- Subject: Re: Liberty (was something relevant about CO-2 long ago...)
- Message-ID: <1992Dec21.223702.8249@panix.com>
- Date: 21 Dec 92 22:37:02 GMT
- References: <1992Dec18.194804.2371@tc.cornell.edu ><BzH9Ho.241F@austin.ibm.com ><1992Dec20.113945.26727@panix.com ><BzM9Fy.23H3@austin.ibm.com>
- Organization: (getting there)
- Lines: 35
-
- alan@auntbea.austin.ibm.com (Alan R. Weiss) writes yet more drivel.
- He's addressed it to Melinda, to Tim, to Ry and to me, and I think
- there are more in the thread.
-
- I don't think that this discussion has any relevance to soc.motss.
- If Alan wants to take it to soc.women, or to alt.feminism or
- soc.feminism, I think they would be appropriate venues. I don't
- read soc.bi, so I have no opinion on whether or not it belongs
- there.
-
- There's really nothing to answer, until the end:
-
- >>>Secondly, you're absolutely correct about one thing: I don't
- >>>think this is a very big priority, in my life. No, I'm not
- >>>insensitive or boorish or stooopid -- >
- >>I guess you're just a pretty good actor, then. You sure had me
- >>fooled.
- >Then you fool pretty easy. And, clearly, I'm wasting my time
- >here with you, since you do not choose to see *any* validity
- >in *anything* I said. Which means you are either stupid, boorish,
- >or insensitive. This is quite dismaying - I just can't believe
- >that you are *that* stuck on auto-pilot, Mara. It must be
- >my fault, then - I didn't communicate clearly enough.
-
- Perhaps we can agree that it's your fault.
- What do you say we put it to a vote?
-
- Anyhow, I think it's a first. Nobody in soc.motss has ever said
- anything like this to me before. Bob, are you listening?
-
-
- --
-
- Mara Chibnik
- mara@panix.com Life is too important to be taken seriously.
-