home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky seattle.general:4242 pnw.general:3036 alt.society.civil-liberty:7027
- Newsgroups: seattle.general,pnw.general,alt.society.civil-liberty,misc.talk.poli
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!hp-cv!hp-pcd!hpcvca!hpcvccl.cv.hp.com!scott
- From: scott@hpcvccl.cv.hp.com (Scott Linn)
- Subject: Re: Freedom, Social Responsibility, Individual Responsibility
- Message-ID: <1992Dec23.011135.5262@hpcvca.cv.hp.com>
- Sender: nobody@hpcvca.cv.hp.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hpcvccl.cv.hp.com
- Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company, Corvallis, Oregon USA
- References: <BznJx9.JG3@agora.rain.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 01:11:35 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- lcline@agora.rain.com (Larry Cline) writes:
- : >It isn't *government* which is limiting personal freedoms in order to make
- : >expenses lower; it's the *people*. The majority of people voted these
- : >seatbelt, helmet, etc. laws into effect, in order to decrease *their*
- : >costs.
- :
- : I believe the term for this is "tyranny of the majority".
-
- Not that I'm defending the concept, but just look at the US government, and
- what do you see: the same thing. The majority votes in who they want for
- their representatives, and that is what everyone is stuck with. If that
- rep likes to chop down all the forests (or not chop anything), then that
- is what you get. It is *all* "tyranny of the majority".
-
- Scott Linn
- scott@hpcvccl.cv.hp.com
-