home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky seattle.general:4209 pnw.general:3004 alt.society.civil-liberty:7009
- Newsgroups: seattle.general,pnw.general,alt.society.civil-liberty,misc.talk.poli
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!hpscit.sc.hp.com!cupnews0.cup.hp.com!news1.boi.hp.com!hp-pcd!hpcvca!hpcvccl.cv.hp.com!scott
- From: scott@hpcvccl.cv.hp.com (Scott Linn)
- Subject: Re: Freedom, Social Responsibility, Individual Responsibility
- Message-ID: <1992Dec21.210708.17518@hpcvca.cv.hp.com>
- Sender: nobody@hpcvca.cv.hp.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hpcvccl.cv.hp.com
- Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company, Corvallis, Oregon USA
- References: <1992Dec20.211114.3823@sequent.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 21:07:08 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- dickwin@sequent.com (Dick Winningstad) writes:
- :
- : Again I would suggest that government can not do everything, and it
- : should make some hard economic choices if it is determined that
- : government can not fund all it wants to do. The government should not
- : limit personal freedom in order to make its expenses lower.
-
- Minor nit:
-
- It isn't *government* which is limiting personal freedoms in order to make
- expenses lower; it's the *people*. The majority of people voted these
- seatbelt, helmet, etc. laws into effect, in order to decrease *their*
- costs.
-
- Scott Linn
- scott@hpcvccl.cv.hp.com
-