home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.space.shuttle:3033 alt.conspiracy:13442 talk.politics.misc:65405
- Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle,alt.conspiracy,talk.politics.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!ringer!lonestar.utsa.edu!sbooth
- From: sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth)
- Subject: Re: STS-1 Disaster -- follow-up #2
- Message-ID: <1992Dec27.222007.28325@ringer.cs.utsa.edu>
- Sender: news@ringer.cs.utsa.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: lonestar.utsa.edu
- Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
- References: <D2150035.lsrsh6@outpost.SF-Bay.org>
- Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 22:20:07 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <D2150035.lsrsh6@outpost.SF-Bay.org> peirce@outpost.SF-Bay.org (Michael Peirce) writes:
- >
- >In article <78159@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM> (sci.space.shuttle,alt.conspiracy,talk.politics.misc), mwilson@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM (Mark Wilson) writes:
- >> In article <1h3059INNq8n@news.cerf.net>, eidetics@nic.cerf.net (Eidetics Int'l) writes:
- >> | 8) One source that you may want to use for your research is "Aviation Week and
- >> | Space Technology". This weekly industry journal has reported every shuttle
- >> | flight in great detail. They go to great lengths to find and report on
- >> | secret or classified data. You will find not a hint about the secret flight.
- >> |
- >> | THEY ARE EITHER IGNORANT THEMSELVES, OR AFRAID TO SAY ANYTHING.
- >>
- >> Considering the average shuttle launch can be seen for several hundred
- >> miles, how did they manage to launch one, and NOBODY noticed.
- >
- >It's obvious: secret bases in the Pacific.
- No, it was underground silos in Brazil! :-)
-
- (see the James Bond film 'Moonraker' for more details. I always wondered
- how one could launch 6 shuttles from underground without anyone seeing
- them launch, and without anyone feeling the ground shaking)
-
- Simon
-
-