home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU!CSD-NewsHost!jmc
- From: jmc@SAIL.Stanford.EDU (John McCarthy)
- Subject: Shuttle operational costs
- Message-ID: <JMC.93Jan1102630@SAIL.Stanford.EDU>
- Sender: news@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU
- Reply-To: jmc@cs.Stanford.EDU
- Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University
- Date: 1 Jan 93 10:26:30
- Lines: 36
-
- The problem with the shuttle is that the cost of getting the shuttles
- ready for the next flight are too large. It was not anticipated that
- so many people would be required. Indeed it was planned that the
- shuttle would be operated like a commercial airplane. Any future
- reusable spacecraft must be planned to reduce these costs. However,
- the almost interminable discussions of shuttle vs. something else
- haven't gone into detail on operational costs. Does anyone have
- information relevant to the following questions?
-
- 1. What is the distribution of manpower between various functions
- of maintaining the shuttle operation?
-
- 2. How many people actually lay hands on the shuttles and shuttle
- components between flights?
-
- 3. How many supervisors are there?
-
- 4. What costs are imposed by the split between Cape Canaveral,
- Houston and other locations?
-
- 5. Would having more shuttles reduce the cost per flight?
-
- 6. Does NASA plan to reduce manpower?
-
- 7. What shuttle components require the most manpower between
- flights?
-
- 8. How much expense is due to layers of bureaucracy?
-
- 9. How did manpower expended in shuttle operations change
- in response to the Challenger crash?
- --
- John McCarthy, Computer Science Department, Stanford, CA 94305
- *
- He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
-
-