home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / sci / space / 18454 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-12-30  |  1.4 KB
  1. Xref: sparky sci.space:18454 talk.politics.space:1649
  2. Newsgroups: sci.space,talk.politics.space
  3. Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!eos!aio!news
  4. From: Dr. Norman J. LaFave <lafave@ial4.jsc.nasa.gov>
  5. Subject: Re: Government-run programs  Was: Re: Justification for the Space Program
  6. Message-ID: <1992Dec30.230013.4102@aio.jsc.nasa.gov>
  7. X-Xxdate: Wed, 30 Dec 92 16:56:30 GMT
  8. Sender: news@aio.jsc.nasa.gov (USENET News System)
  9. Organization: Lockheed Engineering & Sciences Company
  10. X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d12
  11. References: <1992Dec30.212906.2444@aio.jsc.nasa.gov>
  12. Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 23:00:13 GMT
  13. Lines: 23
  14.  
  15. In article <1992Dec30.214118.6461@cs.rochester.edu> Paul Dietz,
  16. dietz@cs.rochester.edu writes:
  17. >You have to be careful with polls.  A poll in which people are asked
  18. >"do you want a manned space program?" will ellicit a generally
  19. >positive response.  However, similar questions on other issues, like
  20. >education, health care, and so on, ellicit much more positive
  21. >responses.  The *relative* support of the space program is not very
  22. >high.
  23.  
  24. Another Dietz assertion-without-proof... Please
  25. provide data which shows the relative support.
  26.  
  27. Norman
  28.  
  29. Dr. Norman J. LaFave
  30. Senior Engineer
  31. Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Company
  32.  
  33.  
  34.  
  35.  
  36. When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
  37.                                Hunter Thompson
  38.