home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!sgiblab!sgigate!sgi!fido!solntze.wpd.sgi.com!livesey
- From: livesey@solntze.wpd.sgi.com (Jon Livesey)
- Newsgroups: sci.skeptic
- Subject: Re: Biosphere II News
- Date: 31 Dec 1992 05:53:56 GMT
- Organization: sgi
- Lines: 15
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <1hu1tkINNb4h@fido.asd.sgi.com>
- References: <X5LmwB4w164w@cellar.org>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: solntze.wpd.sgi.com
-
- In article <X5LmwB4w164w@cellar.org>, revpk@cellar.org (Brian 'Rev P-K' Siano) writes:
- |>
- |> Lord knows how reliable this is, but both Buzzworm and the Whole
- |> Earth Review are running articles about Biosphere this month. Whole Earth's
- |> article by Kevin Kelley-- who is an advisor of some sort to the project, so
- |> caveats up, gang-- reports that, while the Biospherians have managed to live
- |> for a year inside the structure, it hasn't been easy.
-
- What do they mean when they say "while the Biospherians have managed
- to live for a year inside the structure"?
-
- I thought I saw a newspaper report that one or more of them had left
- it temporarily, and then returned. Was I mistaken?
-
- jon.
-