home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!agate!matt
- From: matt@physics.berkeley.edu (Matt Austern)
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Subject: Re: moderating sci.physics - physics is everything
- Date: 31 Dec 92 22:39:25
- Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (Theoretical Physics Group)
- Lines: 19
- Message-ID: <MATT.92Dec31223925@physics.berkeley.edu>
- References: <1992Dec23.015841.11925@u.washington.edu> <1992Dec24.053044.2763@nuscc.nus.sg>
- <1992Dec27.051444.767@dmp.csiro.au>
- Reply-To: matt@physics.berkeley.edu
- NNTP-Posting-Host: physics.berkeley.edu
- In-reply-to: lachlan@dmp.csiro.au's message of Sun, 27 Dec 1992 05:14:44 GMT
-
- In article <1992Dec27.051444.767@dmp.csiro.au> lachlan@dmp.csiro.au (Lachlan Cranswick) writes:
-
- > Is there going to be moderation? - I hope not.
- >
- > Moderation implies that 1 or 5 or 20 people will define
- > what physics "is" in this group.
-
- There is not going to be moderation of sci.physics. Nobody has
- suggested that.
-
- What has been suggested is that a new newsgroup be created, and that
- this new newsgroup should be moderated. People who prefer a more
- uninhibited discussion can continue to read sci.physics.
-
- --
- Matthew Austern Just keep yelling until you attract a
- (510) 644-2618 crowd, then a constituency, a movement, a
- austern@lbl.bitnet faction, an army! If you don't have any
- matt@physics.berkeley.edu solutions, become a part of the problem!
-