home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!nntp.msstate.edu!Ra.MsState.Edu!rsf1
- From: rsf1@Ra.MsState.Edu (Robert S. Fritzius)
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Subject: General Relativity Tests
- Keywords: Perihelion advancement
- Message-ID: <rsf1.725556854@Ra.MsState.Edu>
- Date: 28 Dec 92 15:34:14 GMT
- Sender: news@ra.msstate.edu
- Organization: Mississippi State University
- Lines: 53
- Nntp-Posting-Host: ra.msstate.edu
-
- In the Authorized Translation of Einstein's book "Relativity, The Special
- and General Theory," Crown Publishers, Inc., New York (1961), Appendix III
- is titled, "The Experimental Confirmation of the General Theory of
- Relativity." Section (a) of this appendix deals with the motion of the
- perihelion of Mercury. (Keep in mind that this translation is aimed at
- friendly high school graduates.)
-
- In the book, the (simplified?) GR equation that Einstein used to compute
- the angular advancement between perihelion passages for a planet is shown
- on page 125.
-
- 24 * pi^3 * a^2
- + ------------------------
- T^2 * c^2 * (1 - e^2)
-
- where a = semi-major axis of planetary ellipse
- T = period of revolution
- c = speed of light
- e = eccentricity of planetary ellipse
-
-
- The factor pi^3 standing alone looks intimidatingly mathematically
- elegant, and that other stuff is nice, but
-
- pi^2 * a^2 v^2
- to first order ------------ = -------- ,
- T^2 * c^2 c^2
-
- where v is the average speed of the planet in orbit.
-
-
- 24 * pi v^2
- This gives ----------- * -------- = 43 arc secs, for Mercury.
- (1 - e^2) c^2
-
- It's my understanding that the c^2 factor relates to Einstein's view that
- gravitational effects (static and dynamic) travel at the speed of light and
- that 'c' in this case represents *the* gravitational propagation speed.
-
- (If the so-called static speed of gravity was, say 200,000 times the speed
- of light, or greater, then Einstein's equation would predict an undetectable
- advancement for Mercury and we wouldn't be having all this fun.)
-
- The quantities v^2 / c^2 and (1 - e^2) seem like reasonable elements,
- and reasonably placed, in such an (approximate) equation.
-
- Can somebody provide a *rigorous* general relativity rationale for the
- remaining 24 * pi factor? (If this is the wrong question, please
- answer the question that should have been asked.)
-
- Robert S. Fritzius rsf1@ra.msstate.edu
-
-
-