home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!crdgw1!newsun!dseeman
- From: dseeman@novell.com (Daniel Seeman)
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Subject: Re: can sound waves boil water?
- Message-ID: <1992Dec22.213753.9192@novell.com>
- Date: 22 Dec 92 21:37:53 GMT
- References: <1992Dec22.151439.29874@nuscc.nus.sg> <1992Dec22.191142.7093@novell.com> <1992Dec22.200842.9033@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- Sender: news@novell.com (The Netnews Manager)
- Organization: Novell Inc., San Jose, Califonia
- Lines: 73
- Nntp-Posting-Host: db.sjf.novell.com
-
- In article <1992Dec22.200842.9033@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> crb7q@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Cameron Randale Bass) writes:
- >In article <1992Dec22.191142.7093@novell.com> dseeman@novell.com (Daniel Seeman) writes:
- >>In article <1992Dec22.151439.29874@nuscc.nus.sg> eng10370@nusunix1.nus.sg (CHEW JOO SIANG) writes:
- >>>I was thinking of this the other day - we all know that a microwave oven
- >>>works by resonating the water molecules at its natural frequency - this
- >>>causes a rise in its temperature. The question is, can we do the same
- >>>with sound waves - using it to resonate the water molecules. I know that
- >>>you need incredibly high frequecies to achieve it but is the concept
- >>>sound theoretically?
- >>
- >>Hi,
- >>
- >>The reason Microwaves vibrate the water to resonance is partially due to
- >>their wave length. And that magical wave length is on the order of centimeters.
- >>A bit of simple calculation tells you the frequency for ---say, a 3cm Microwave
- >>would be:
- >>
- >> f = c/l (l= wave length, c = speed of light, f = frequency)
- >>
- >> f = ~3x10^8(m/sec)/.03m = 1x10^10 (cycles/sec)
- >>
- >>The above frequency is roughly resonance. (The wave length I used is a bit too
- >
- > Banish this word 'resonance'. The reason microwaves vibrate water
- > is related to wavelength, but it is not at a 'resonance' in common usage
- > of the term. There are various 'microwaves' that dielectrically heat
- > water. Typical frequencies are 915 Mhz, 2.45 Ghz, etc., however
- > these frequencies are not exclusive. There is a range of frequencies
- > in which heating can be effectively accomplished. I suggest Arthur
- > von Hipple's "Dielectrics and Waves" for an explanation of mechanisms
- > from a classical approach to a quantum approach.
- >
- >>small ---take a look at the wave guide on you local micro wave receiver dish
- >>and see what it's dimensions are---but it made the calculation easy ;-).
- >>Now all you need to do is to find the speed of sound in water and find the
- >>wave length of sound that is needed to provide the same agitation that the
- >>micro wave made. Then, just design your sound amplifier/wave generator to these
- >>specifications.
- >
- > Sound is a different disturbance, whose properties are
- > different from a electromagnetic wave. Do not expect to
- > have to go to Ghz ranges to effectively 'boil' water, especially
- > considering DC current can boil water.
- >
- >>Due to the wave's length and characteristics it would take longer for sound
- >>sources to heat water (otherwise you could hear your home's fast cooker
- >>working every night as it heats the evening's dinner...). In this case, you
- >>are relying on pressure waves to eventually excite the molecules to resonance,
- >>rather than fluctuating electro-magnetic fields.
- >
- > Please strike this word 'resonance'. A resonance for water in
- > E&M waves is up in the tens of Ghz range. Dielectric heating is
- > not a resonance phenomenon in the noted range.
- >
- > dale bass
- >
- >--
- >C. R. Bass crb7q@virginia.edu
- >Department of Mechanical,
- > Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering
- >University of Virginia (804) 924-7926
-
- Hi,
-
- Dale, you are of course right. I had some trouble with that word resonance too
- when I was writing this response, but continued on my thought anyway. I suppose
- that points to my laziness, (read not much confidence in my intuition---"hey, I
- knew that! Why didn't I just say it!") Still, I hope (at least for discussion's
- sake) that some of the information is ---well--- accurate...
-
- Happy Holidays!
-
- dks.
-