home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!enterpoop.mit.edu!galois!riesz!jbaez
- From: jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez)
- Subject: Re: TIME HAS INERTIA - NewScientist Article
- Message-ID: <1992Dec20.193537.26222@galois.mit.edu>
- Sender: news@galois.mit.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: riesz
- Organization: MIT Department of Mathematics, Cambridge, MA
- References: <102227@netnews.upenn.edu> <93e1VB1w165w@dorsai.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Dec 92 19:35:37 GMT
- Lines: 30
-
- In article <93e1VB1w165w@dorsai.com> shire@dorsai.com (Kenneth Shire) writes:
- >> What's sad is that he died (1930) on an expedition in deep Greenland, and
- >> so there was no one to really push the theory afterward.
-
- >Sad indeed! Though I am not by profession a physical scientist, it seems
- >that the it was not simply that the observational evidence didn't jibe
- >with Wegener's theory that did it in. My training is in sociology, and
- >more specifically in ethnomethodology, which deals in the ways in which
- >members of groups cooperate to put together a version of "reality" that
- >they find convincing and within which they can operate to achieve their
- >goals.
-
- >BTW, though I have seen one biographical essay on Wegener, I am always in
- >search biographical material and any and all information on articles,
- >books, monographs, in English would be appreciated. [I know there are
- >German books but I'm not up to the translation.]
-
- For those who forget, we're talking here about the continental drift
- theory. A somewhat interesting book to check out is The Reception of
- Unconventional Science, edited by Seymour H. Mauskopf. It consists of 4
- essays. One of the best is a little history and analysis of the
- reception of the continental drift theory. The other 3 are about: the
- reception of quantum physics in England, the reception of Rhine's work
- on parapsychology (which was apparently ran into some difficulty simply
- because of a general distrust of statistics at the time -- not because
- statistics were being used wrong, simply because statistics in general
- was new and unfamiliar!), and the reception of acupuncture in the West.
- The fact that two of these theories are "true", one "false" and one
- still murky is nice.
-
-