home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Path: sparky!uunet!psinntp!scylla!daryl
- From: daryl@oracorp.com (Daryl McCullough)
- Subject: Re: FTL communication in SR does not violate causality
- Message-ID: <1992Dec22.022645.5016@oracorp.com>
- Organization: ORA Corporation
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 02:26:45 GMT
- Lines: 29
-
- markc@smsc.sony.com (Mark Corscadden) writes:
-
- MC> ... The existence of a preferred frame violates
- MC> the principles of Special Relativity (I believe) but it does not contradict
- MC> the mathematics of SR, and it's the math that has been confirmed over and
- MC> over by experimentation.
-
- >Instead of being timid I should have said that my use of a preferred
- >reference frame violates the principles of Special Relativity, period!
- >Also, the "mathematics of SR" I refer to are only the mathematics of the
- >Lorentz coordinate transform, which I *do* assume to be universally valid.
- >I could have been more clear about these points.
-
- What do you mean by saying that the Lorentz coordinate transform is
- "universally valid"? The meaning in Special Relativity is that the
- laws of physics are invariant with respect to the Lorentz
- transformations. In your case, you are postulating a Faster Than Light
- communication, which can easily be seen to violate this postulate. A
- statement such as "It is possible to send a FTL message to a location
- a distance of one light-year away such that it will arrive at the same
- time it left" is only true in some reference frames, and not others.
-
- So, to repeat: if your laws are not Lorentz-invariant, then what does
- it mean to assume that the Lorentz transformations are universally
- valid?
-
- Daryl McCullough
- ORA Corp.
- Ithaca, NY
-