home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!chnews!sedona!bhoughto
- From: bhoughto@sedona.intel.com (Blair P. Houghton)
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Subject: Re: Materials for simple static electricity expts.
- Date: 22 Dec 1992 00:21:59 GMT
- Organization: Intel Corp., Chandler, Arizona
- Lines: 31
- Message-ID: <1h5n37INNlu6@chnews.intel.com>
- References: <1992Dec15.210441.28006@ncar.ucar.edu> <Dec.16.20.40.12.1992.9610@ruhets.rutgers.edu> <1992Dec18.234928.16107@sfu.ca>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: stealth.intel.com
-
- In article <1992Dec18.234928.16107@sfu.ca> palmer@sfu.ca (Leigh Palmer) writes:
- >To this day I do not know why one end of that rod was etched, but I do
- >know that I was rubbing the wrong end! My best guess is that the end is
- >etched so that the *knowledgeable* physicist will always pick it up by
- >that end, so as not to soil and render less effective the *other* end,
- >which, as you've probably guessed, electrifies like gangbusters when
- >clean and rubbed with the silk cloth.
-
- My guess is your guess is correct.
-
- Triboelectrification works purely by contact. The function
- of rubbing is to bring more "virgin" material into contact.
- Because the two materials are insulators (find me two that
- aren't and are still good for demos of triboelectrification),
- you can't simply place them together and incant olde english;
- you need to deform the silk fibers, rotating their large
- total surface to the face of the cloth, and rub them
- maximally around on the surface of the glass.
-
- As you might imagine, etched glass has very little readily
- available surface area, even though it would have fractally
- much more total surface area.
-
- I think in addition to the anti-oil argument, it's just
- plain easier for rickety old physics lecturers to hang on
- to the etched end than the smooth end.
-
- Maybe if you'd been a bit more ancient yourself...
-
- --Blair
- "Polystyrene peanuts are an absolute gas."
-