home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.military
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!hubcap!ncrcae!ncrhub2!ciss!law7!military
- From: "Charles K. Scott" <Charles.K.Scott@dartmouth.edu>
- Subject: Re: Worst allied fighter in WW2
- Message-ID: <C017Ct.3rp@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM>
- Sender: military@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM (Sci.Military Login)
- Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
- References: <BzH4v6.AMp@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM>
- Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 17:31:41 GMT
- Approved: military@law7.daytonoh.ncr.com
- Lines: 26
-
-
- From "Charles K. Scott" <Charles.K.Scott@dartmouth.edu>
-
- In article <Bzs8uq.LDr@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM>
- ntaib@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Iskandar Taib) writes:
-
- > What is a coupled engine? Would this be the H and W cylinder
- > configurations we talked baout earlier?
-
- A coupled engine is two engines mechanically connected via some sort of
- fiendishly complicated gear box to drive one propellor. They can be
- side by side or end to end. I don't recollect any truely successfull
- designs although the Germans had one flying operationally. It had an
- unfortunate tendency to burst into flame fairly often. The design was
- an attempt to make a four engined bomber. Things got pretty
- complicated due to a strange request on the part of the German Air
- Administration to have the bomber, among it's other design criteria, be
- able to dive bomb. Try to imagine a flight of B-17's approaching the
- target then suddenly nosing over into a 70 degree dive. Needless to
- say, this didn't work, the neccessity for engineering the aircraft to
- dive bombing specs wreaked havoc with the opperational performance.
- Eventually the powers that be realised the folly of the demand and
- rescinded it, but by then the aircraft was hopeless.
-
- Corky Scott
-
-