home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.military
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!hubcap!ncrcae!ncrhub2!ciss!law7!military
- From: Gary Coffman <emory!ke4zv!gary@gatech.edu>
- Subject: Re: Prussian Military
- Message-ID: <Bzo8DD.BJ9@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM>
- Sender: military@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM (Sci.Military Login)
- Organization: Gannett Technologies Group
- References: <Bz9Ez9.6Ix@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> <BzEz50.Ezs@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM>
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 17:24:49 GMT
- Approved: military@law7.daytonoh.ncr.com
- Lines: 25
-
-
- From Gary Coffman <emory!ke4zv!gary@gatech.edu>
-
- In article <BzEz50.Ezs@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> silber@cs.uiuc.edu writes:
- >
- >From silber@cs.uiuc.edu
- >
- >
- >
- >I wonder what point of development anti-cavalry tactics were at
- >this point in time. Weren't infantry still armed with matchlocks
- >and pikes? Perhaps bayonets had just come into vogue and the square
- >hadn't been perfected yet. Or perhaps the Austrians were taken by
- >surprise and didn't have time to form square.
-
- The square was perfected by the Romans. With the advent of guns, the
- square became less useful as a defensive formation. Even if the enemy
- missed you, he was likely to hit your opposite number in the back.
- That's one reason the line tactic was developed, to reduce the depth
- of the target for musket fire and to allow all muskets to be mass
- fired at the same target.
-
- Gary
-
-
-