home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.military
- Path: sparky!uunet!psinntp!ncrlnk!ncrhub2!ciss!law7!military
- From: eriks@lin.foa.se (Erik Svensson FOA2)
- Subject: Re: Helos vs. tanks
- Message-ID: <BzM9u5.MCy@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM>
- Sender: military@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM (Sci.Military Login)
- Organization: FOA, Linkoping, Sweden
- References: <ByJI6s.24E@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> <Bz3v30.2v4@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> <BzD4rG.Iv1@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM> <BzH5C3.BFJ@law7.DaytonOH.NCR.COM>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 16:01:17 GMT
- Approved: military@law7.daytonoh.ncr.com
- Lines: 21
-
-
- From eriks@lin.foa.se (Erik Svensson FOA2)
-
- >From wwo@vax5.cit.cornell.edu (Thomas Schoene)
-
- >As others have commented, Phalanx is rather too large for this. Some Israeli
- >company actaully proposed Phalanx as a land-based air defense system and it
- >would have required its own truck as a prime mover.
-
- I saw a mock-up of that in Paris last year. A phalanx /Barak combo for point
- defence of high-value targets. It was huge. I do wonder if they ever got one
- sold.
- --
- Erik Svensson Research Officer
- Guided Weapons Division National Defense Research Establishment (FOA)
- Stockholm Sweden
-
- net.address: eriks@fenix.lin.foa.se
-
- "Another casualty of applied meta-physics!" -- Hobbes
-
-