home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!mintaka.lcs.mit.edu!zurich.ai.mit.edu!ara
- From: ara@zurich.ai.mit.edu (Allan Adler)
- Subject: Re: more math puzzles
- In-Reply-To: mbeattie@black.ox.ac.uk's message of 18 Dec 92 10:14:09 GMT
- Message-ID: <ARA.92Dec23115312@camelot.ai.mit.edu>
- Sender: news@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu
- Organization: M.I.T. Artificial Intelligence Lab.
- References: <24341@galaxy.ucr.edu> <1992Dec18.101409.4666@black.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 16:53:12 GMT
- Lines: 52
-
-
-
- I'm not entirely convinced by Macolm Beattie's explanation that the tangent
- bundle to L is nontrivial and there is another point he raises that I
- would like to address.
-
- Suppose the tangent bundle to L is nontrivial. Then as he points out
- there is a nowhere vanishing vector field on L. I don't integrate
- vector fields very often, but it seems to me that this implies that
- there is an action of R on L, where R is the additive group of real
- numbers, which I will refer to as translation on L. Translating by
- a real number x will be a mapping from L to itself and any mapping
- from L to itself fixes a closed cofinal subset. This is therefore
- true for x=1, x= 1/2, x=1/4, and so on. The intersection of countably
- many closed cofinal subsets of L is itself closed and cofinal,
- so there is a closed cofinal (in particular nonempty) subset of L
- every points of which is fixed by all translations. The vector field
- vanishes at such a point.
-
- It is not true that every continuous map from R to L is eventually constant.
- R can be mapped homeomorphically onyo an open interval of R, hence of
- one of the intervals used to make up L. It is, however, true that
- any map from L to R is eventually constant. More generally, any
- map from L to a metric space is eventually constant. To prove this,
- note that L is sequentially compact and that any continuous map must
- preserve sequential compactness. So if f: L--> M is continuous and
- u is in L then, denoting by Lu the part of L above and including u,
- f(L_u) is sequentially compact and hence compact, since M is a metric
- space. Therefore, the intersection of f(L_u) is nonempty as u goes
- to infinity in L. That proves there is a u such that f(u) is
- taken on cofinally as a value. Since any two cofinal closed subsets
- of L meet, it follows that f is eventually constant and equal to f(u).
-
- One application of this is that L is itself not metrizable. Here is another:
- it is proved in Singer and Thorpe, e.g. that the product of continuum
- many unit intervals is not metrizable. But using the long line, you can
- prove that the product of aleph-1 unit intervals is not metrizable:
- for each countable ordinal b, you can map L onto the b-th interval that
- makes up the long half line by making the map the identity on the interval,
- scrunching stuff before the interval into the left endpoint and scrunching
- stuff after the interval into the right endpoint. That gives a family
- of mappings into [0,1] indexed by the countable ordinals and these maps
- separate points of the long half line(which is what I actually proved the
- property for, i.e. that maps into metric spaces are eventually constant).
- The product of this family of maps is a continuous injective map from the
- long half line into the product of aleph-1 copies of [0,1]. Therefore,
- that product is not a metric space.
-
- This proves that the long line is good for something. :)
-
- Allan Adler
- ara@altdorf.ai.mit.edu
-