home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!apple!TIS.COM!mjr
- From: mjr@TIS.COM (Marcus J. Ranum)
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt
- Subject: Re: LUC vs. RSA
- Message-ID: <9301020112.AA19029@TIS.COM>
- Date: 2 Jan 93 01:12:04 GMT
- References: <1992Dec29.002027.19298@unislc.uucp> <9212291723.AA25966@chaos.intercon.com>
- Sender: daemon@Apple.COM
- Reply-To: mjr@TIS.COM
- Organization: Trusted Information Systems, Inc.
- Lines: 8
-
- >Where it was developed is not relevant to ITAR. If it performs encipherment,
- >it's covered--doesn't matter if it's foreign, domestic, PD or commercial.
-
- LUC is also "patent applied for" according to the last couple of
- lines of the article in Dobbs'. So it's likely to be neither free to use
- or exportable.
-
- mjr.
-