home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt
- Path: sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!rose!usenet
- From: robert.heuman@rose.com (robert heuman)
- Subject: LUC vs. RSA
- Organization: Rose Media Inc, Toronto, Ontario.
- Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 15:17:51 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Dec30.151754.10932@rose.com>
- Sender: usenet@rose.com (Usenet Gateway)
- X-Gated-By: Usenet <==> RoseMail Gateway (v1.70)
- Lines: 39
-
-
- Date Entered: 12-30-92 10:07
- amanda@intercon.com (Amanda Walker) writes, in
- Message-ID: <9212291723.AA25966@chaos.intercon.com>
-
- re something developed in Aussie land:
-
- A> Where it was developed is not relevant to ITAR. If it performs encipherment,
- A> it's covered--doesn't matter if it's foreign, domestic, PD or commercial.
- A> This is the principle manner in which ITAR presents a trade barrier to U.S.
- A> vendors who are trying to compete in international markets.
- A>
- A> The Department of Commerce likes exports. The Department of State doesn't.
- A> That's the U.S. regulatory system for you.
-
- I believe (I could be wrong) Australia is part of COCOM, which means
- that crypto software and hardware are covered, and cannot be exported
- or imported without permission from the government. The ITARs are US
- only, but the COCOM regs are not, and still cover the product.
-
- Bob
- ---
-
- ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Enjoy the season, for next year is but a few days away,
- x x x x x x x x with its new set of governmentally imposed problems.
- x x x x x x x x
- x x x x x x x x (and in Canada, new and higher postage rates......)
- xx x x x x xx
- x x x x x x
- xx x x xx
- x x x x
- xxxxx
- xxx
- xxxxx
- xxxxxxx
-
- RoseReader 1.70 P001886: This Canadian has an Opinion...His Own!
- ---
- RM 2.00 : RoseNet<=>Usenet Gateway : Rose Media 416-733-2285
-