home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.bio
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!linus!linus.mitre.org!mwunix!m23364
- From: m23364@mwunix (James Meritt)
- Subject: Re: Evolution of the human brain's cognitive capacity
- Message-ID: <1992Dec29.143625.1463@linus.mitre.org>
- Sender: news@linus.mitre.org (News Service)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: mwunix.mitre.org
- Organization: MITRE Corporation, McLean VA
- References: <1992Dec24.025548.27816@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> <Bzrn4H.GMq@newcastle.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 14:36:25 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <Bzrn4H.GMq@newcastle.ac.uk> w.p.coyne@newcastle.ac.uk writes:
- }darice@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Fred Rice) writes:
- }
- }>I was wondering, is there an evolutionary explanation for the great
- }>capacities humans have to think? I'm thinking about things like our
- }>ability to do advanced mathematics, for instance. There is no
- }>evolutionary survival advantage in being able to solve differential
- }>equations, for instance. If this is the case, then *why*, in
- }>evolutionary terms, can we do such things?
- }
- }Maybe you should rephrase the question "What are the forces which have
- }pushed/pulled human intelligence up to the level where it has given
- }humans the ability to do such abstract things as differential
- }equations?"
-
- Bad example. Catching a branch after a free-fall requires the
- "unconscious" solution of a DE. Catching a ball is a complicated
- set of equations. Now, being able to express it AS equations is recent,
- but the ability to solve them isn't....
-
-