home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.astro:13548 sci.space:18460 sci.physics:21926 sci.environment:14099
- Newsgroups: sci.astro,sci.space,sci.physics,sci.environment
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!gatech!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!fs1.ee.ubc.ca!davem
- From: davem@ee.ubc.ca (Dave Michelson)
- Subject: Re: averting doom
- Message-ID: <1992Dec31.003241.3647@ee.ubc.ca>
- Organization: University of BC, Electrical Engineering
- References: <JMC.92Dec29211051@SAIL.Stanford.EDU> <72616@cup.portal.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 00:32:41 GMT
- Lines: 14
-
- In article <72616@cup.portal.com> lordSnooty@cup.portal.com (Andrew - Palfreyman) writes:
- >I like the simplicity of this idea (moving the Earth instead of
- >trying to shield it), but what the heck's all this "elastic
- >collisions" stuff? Surely you're not serious about the "broken
- >Kepler" business?
- >
- I think John's "broken Kepler" method is essentially the "patched conic"
- approximation. Please correct me if I've misinterpreted this...
-
- --
- Dave Michelson
- davem@ee.ubc.ca
-
-
-