home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.astro:13398 sci.space:18149
- Newsgroups: sci.astro,sci.space
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!torn!utzoo!henry
- From: henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer)
- Subject: Re: Giotto Sample Return ?
- Message-ID: <BzqLED.M4y@zoo.toronto.edu>
- Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 00:01:22 GMT
- References: <1992Dec23.194709.4135@bnlux1.bnl.gov>
- Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
- Lines: 37
-
- In article <1992Dec23.194709.4135@bnlux1.bnl.gov> wagener@gown.das.bnl.gov (Richard Wagener) writes:
- >... Its [Giotto's] orbit brings it to within 210000 km of Earth on
- >July 1, 1999. Although the spacecraft still has some fuel left, ESA
- >has no plans for more Giotto missions. - Stephen Cole
- >
- >Is there enough fuel to change the orbit for a closer encounter
- >with Earth? Could it be aerobrake'd into a stable orbit from which it
- >could be captured and returned by the shuttle?
-
- Giotto couldn't safely do more than the most minimal aerobraking; it's
- not built for it. It could do a very small aerobraking maneuver, as was
- done by Hiten and as the Magellan team hopes to do, but it wouldn't be
- enough to accomplish much. (The Magellan aerobraking will -- if done --
- be able to lower Magellan's orbit quite a bit, but only because Magellan
- will fly an aerobraking maneuver every hour or two for *months*. Giotto
- only gets one pass.)
-
- There is undoubtedly enough fuel to target for a closer Earth encounter,
- if you start early. It doesn't take much to make that big a difference
- when it accumulates over a period of years. Problem is, there probably
- isn't enough to fly a useful third mission, e.g. another comet encounter.
- There certainly isn't enough to make any kind of Earth orbit.
-
- A secondary problem is that it's not clear ESA will still be able to talk
- to Giotto in 1999. Maintaining such a capability (while facilities get
- modernized for other purposes) costs money, and it may not be thought
- worth the trouble.
-
- >Would the returned probe contain scientifically useful cometary
- >samples?
-
- The encounter velocities were rather high, especially at Halley, but some
- useful science could undoubtedly be done, if the thing could be retrieved
- easily.
- --
- "God willing... we shall return." | Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
- -Gene Cernan, the Moon, Dec 1972 | henry@zoo.toronto.edu utzoo!henry
-