home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!ukma!cs.widener.edu!dsinc!ub!csn!stortek!sanitas!pg
- From: pg@sanitas.stortek.com (Paul Gilmartin)
- Newsgroups: sci.astro
- Subject: Re: The Hole Story
- Message-ID: <1992Dec22.161149.25215@stortek.com>
- Date: 22 Dec 92 16:11:49 GMT
- References: <BznEHx.71x@well.sf.ca.us>
- Sender: usenet@stortek.com
- Organization: Storage Technology Corp.
- Lines: 21
- Nntp-Posting-Host: sanitas.stortek.com
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL7]
-
- Tom Van Flandern (metares@well.sf.ca.us) wrote:
- : and pg@sanitas.stortek.com (Paul Gilmartin) replied:
- :
- : > I'm curious (and naive). Does the Coulomb potential around a static
- : > electric charge appear retarded or instantaneous? In other words, does an
- : > electric charge in orbit spiral in because of the Poynting-Robertson
- : > effect? I know it spirals in because it radiates because of centripetal
- : > acceleration, but I suppose this is analogous to binary neutron stars
- : > losing orbital energy to gravitational radiation, which you don't attribute
- : > to retarded potential.
- :
- : Electrons can only have discrete energy levels. No spiraling is
- : possible. There aren't any good fundamental explanations of why this is so,
- : but it is clear by experiment that it is.
-
- I didn't say "electron", I said "electric charge", deliberately to allow
- the macroscopic case. According to the Correspondence Principle, even
- electrons approach a classical limit at large quantum numbers. Near this
- limit, the frequency of photons emitted is nearly the same as the orbital
- frequency, and the intensity of emitted radiation is close to the prediction
- of Maxwell's equations. In this regime, "spiraling" is an apt description.
-